Tone and Framing
- Is the language non-shaming, non-paternalistic, and invitational? (e.g., avoids implying that people receiving support are less committed or less worthy)
- Does it frame support as a community care practice rather than charity?
Process Design
- Is the process simple, with minimal emotional or bureaucratic burden? (e.g., no invasive questions or long forms)
- Can people ask for what they need without having to justify or “prove” hardship?
- Are deadlines for requesting support clear, and are they generous enough so folks don’t miss out?
- Is there transparency about how decisions are made?
Privacy and Dignity
- Are requests handled confidentially, so people don’t feel exposed?
- Is there an option for people to reach out directly to a trusted person if they’re uncomfortable with the form or process?
Power Awareness
- Are you acknowledging that financial need can intersect with systemic inequities (race, class, disability, etc.), and making space for that?
- Have you invited feedback from those most affected by financial barriers in designing or revising the process?
Community Solidarity
- Are those who can contribute more invited to do so in a spirit of solidarity (not guilt)?
- Is it clear that receiving support is part of how we co-create the gathering, not separate from it?
View the full course: Kinship Tending Skills: How You Can Contribute to a Culture of Belonging (Festivals & Gatherings Edition)